Jobs Slots: Top Jobs at Sheema DLG, Sheema MC, War Child Canada, Uganda Prisons Service, SteadFIn SACCO, NMG, PPG
June 28, 2019
UPDF impersonator killed, one arrested in toy gun robbery
June 29, 2019
Show all

Furious Anite insists Bemanya must be sacked from UTL without delay

By George Mangula

Despite Friday’s reply from the Deputy Attorney General, Mwesigye Rukutana, that the Minister of Finance has no powers to remove Twebaze Bemanya, the Administrator of Uganda Telecom Limited (UTL) from office, the state minister for privatisation and investment insists that the official must be sacked from that office without delay.

Anite in her second letter has written to the Attorney General, William Byaruhanga, saying that she instructed him to court to replace Bemanya.

“Refer to my letter of June 28, 2019…in regard to the captioned. I candidly instructed you as a Government lawyer to urgently apply to court to replace the current Administrator within the context of section 172 of the Insolvency Act, 2011 and Insolvency Regulations 161(1). The foregoing was after a decision had been taken by Government to remove Mr. Bemanya Twebaze, the official receiver and current administrator and immediately replace him with an individual that we will indicate,” reads part of Anite’s letter.

“The purpose of this letter is to implore you to have the petition to remove the Administrator of Uganda Telecom filed in Court without further delay,” she writes.

Anite says the reply from the Deputy Attorney General Rukutana was simply an opinion that could not stop Bemanya from being sacked. “I received a completely offside reply…from the Deputy Attorney General in regard to my instruction. I will respond to litany of fundamentally flawed innuendos…he listed separately. It is indeed surprising that your Deputy interpreted my communication as a request for opinion,” she writes.

Anite said Rukutana’s response points to a confirmation of a views shared in meeting chaired by her boss Matia Kasaija where it was said that Bemanya is crooked lawyer who is entrenched in Attorney General’s office. “It also points to a common view that a cartel in sections of government is keen to have UTL liquidated and sell to themselves the strategic assets of the company and people of Uganda.

In a letter dated June 26, 2019 and addressed to the Attorney General, minister Anite directed him to get immediate replacement for Bemanya, saying all the concerned parties have lost confidence in the administrator and therefore can no longer work with him.

“Reference is made to the letter of the Hon Minister of Planning & Economic Development to you dated 20 June regarding Uganda Telecom Limited (UTL)… In effect, a decision has been taken to remove Mr Bemanya Twebaze, official receiver as the current administrator and to immediately replace him with an individual that we will indicate.

The purpose of this letter is to request you to urgently apply to Court to replace the current Administrator within the context of Section 172 of the Insolvency Act, 2011, and the Insolvency Regulations (161 (1)),” read the letter in part.

“I will be pleased to swear an Affidavit to support the Application where the supporting reasons will be elaborated. I implore you to have the petition filed without any delay to ensure that the Administration of the Company progresses without any issue. I will appreciate your prompt response,” she wrote.

In reply to the minister, the Deputy Attorney General Mwesigye Rukutana in a letter dated June 28, 2019 says: “I have noted with concern that you have encountered considerable difficulty dealing with the administrator and have completely lost in his ability to continue to serve in that capacity. Unfortunate as it sounds, under our law, the removal of an Administrator from office is provided for under Section (174) (1) (c), of the Insolvency Act. It is noteworthy that under the law, a creditor would be a person listed as competent to apply to court to remove an Administrator from office. Whereas government entities may be listed creditors they have separate legal status. Accordingly a shareholder in this instance the Minister of Finance Planning and Economic Development has no locus to apply to court to remover the Administrator from office.”

Rukutana in the letter says that the fact that Finance Ministry consented to the extension of the contractor of Bemanya on two occasions, is prove that he has been doing his duties as assigned. The minister could only sack him if he had failed to do his duties.

Rukutana has also told Anite that the Speaker of Parliament Rebecca Kadaga ruled on the same matter on June 2019 where she clearly said the Administration is the court-controlled process that can neither be interfered with by the legislature nor the executive. “In light of Right Hon. Speaker’s ruling on this matter, your instruction to me may be perceived as contempt of parliament,” he said.

He has further advised Anite to refrain from interfering in UTL’ administration, saying that the interference may hinder the process of sourcing for the funds to revive the telecom company. He says it may also lead to legal challenge by creditors but also attract liability on government.

 

{ "slotId": "", "unitType": "responsive", "pubId": "pub-7762762382840664", "resize": "auto" }
https://www.secondopinion.co.ug/wp-content/uploads/2021/07/Agriculture_1063x126px_My-Uganda_GoU_Online-Banners_QG3.gif

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *